Search for: "MRS v. State" Results 9621 - 9640 of 21,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2014, 10:46 am by Jeff Kern
In a case of first impression, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:00 am
So changing the CGK analysis inevitably changes the test for inventive step.All of this helps explain why the IPKat is so exercised by yesterday’s decision in Teva UK Limited & another v AstraZeneca AB [2014] EWHC 2873 (Pat), decided by Mr Justice Sales in the Patents Court. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 am by Jeremy
Member States may however allow a work to be used, without its author’s consent, for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am by INFORRM
This right is of the highest importance, especially when the defendant has ventured to criticise the government of the day, or those who hold authority or power in the state. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]