Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9621 - 9640
of 16,588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2013, 6:24 am
” In that commentary, he said that he now sees that Caseyis rightly decided, not just as a matter of stare decisis, but as a matter of constitutional principle, our commitment to equality for women. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
Understands why the brand thinks of it as lost utility, but from overall standpoint it’s not clear why it matters if utility doesn’t dissipate. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
Doesn’t really matter whether there’s confusion. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm
If upheld, the significance would be that those clauses couldn’t be enforced by possession proceedings for breach of tenancy. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm
If upheld, the significance would be that those clauses couldn’t be enforced by possession proceedings for breach of tenancy. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 9:37 am
Cybersecurity isn’t just a matter of federal concern. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
Invalidity challenges: public domain status of nonqualifying subject matter. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
But it’s the next part that really matters—to Tiffany—I’m certain. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 12:34 pm
But Nixon Peabody doesn’t stop there. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 12:34 pm
But Nixon Peabody doesn’t stop there. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:29 am
If a defendant isn’t using a mark to identify the source of its goods, trademark law doesn’t apply. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:00 pm
But Mark D. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Fundamental laws change after a few years of possession; right has its epochs; the entry of Saturn into the Lion marks to us the origin of such and such a crime. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 2:01 pm
The convergence of several IPRs on the same subject-matter poses problems. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 am
In the matter of United States V. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 9:31 am
Strengthening cyber policy certainly won’t run counter to popular opinion. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
Bormann isn’t persuaded—what about the “Guan” mark, for books? [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 12:22 pm
He tells bin Attash lawyer Cheryl Bormann that he only recently began work on privilege and mail matters. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 12:08 pm
But hasn’t the Board, really, essentially granted a franchise to Zyrtec in ZYR as a trademark all its own, a family name that no one else can use no matter how unconfusingly? [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:50 pm
No matter, says Maher. [read post]
