Search for: "POST v. STATE"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 97,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2008, 8:28 pm
Since I have written occasionally about the Supreme Court's treatment of bankruptcy and related laws, the authors of Credit Slips asked that I use my final post to say a few words about Monday's decision in Florida Department of Revenue v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
Posted by Dave WallerBecause hospitality developers are increasingly being encouraged, and in some cases required, to comply with the LEED rating system, we have been keeping an eye on Gifford v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Unzueta v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
Fla.), posted today: This action arises from an out-of-district subpoena directed to the Supervisor of Elections for Monroe County, Florida, issued in connection with US Dominion, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:30 am
In Colwell, the Nevada Supreme Court held that Teague did not apply to state court post-conviction proceedings and adopted a different rule for retroactivity determinations. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm
For example, a note added to the rule in 1985 states that a motion for post-trial relief may not be filed to orders disposing of motions for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm
Joondeph (Santa Clara University - School of Law) has posted The Health Care Cases and the New Meaning of Commandeering on SSRN. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Conflict of Laws.net had a post on a recent decision of the European Court of Justice, Prism Investments BV v. van der Meer. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
This first post will discuss the overall biopharmaceutical market and the FTC’s stated theory of harm. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:22 am
Nick also analyzed how the iPhone’s TouchID feature intersects with the concept of a warrantless search as was determined in Riley v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:23 am
” The post Why justices attend the State of the Union: Two political scientists focus on positivity bias appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:59 am
This post may only make sense to English football fans. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:20 am
The Cato Institute has posted a video of a panel they hosted on Murr v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:44 am
Thanks so much to Professor Neil Richards (who generously serves as our First Amendment guest expert) for his thoughts on Snyder v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:17 am
The first two posts in this series (here and here) discussed opinions from state supreme courts in Arizona and Minnesota considering, post-McNeely v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:51 am
LEXIS 25 (January 16, 2009), aff'g State v. [read post]
