Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 13,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 1:39 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Two rulings by state courts illustrate this point, Croman v City University of New York, 277 AD2d 185, and Parisi v NYC Housing Authority, Appellate Division, First Department, 269 AD2d 210. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:01 pm
Boyle, United States Magistrate Judge. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:30 am
United States, in which the Court held that the “honest services” fraud statute covers only bribery and kickback schemes, lost the appeal of his conviction in the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:07 am
A State Supreme Court judge granted the district’s petition and directed it to terminate Yusko. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:13 pm
United States, Dkt. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:31 am
Judge Rawlinson dissented.The United States petitioned for rehearing en banc. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:03 am
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Midland Central Appraisal District v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:17 am
United States, 10-6866, and Setser v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The Ministerial exception in US case law On 28 March 2011 the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Perich v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
The Public Officers Law §3(1), provides that "[n]o person shall be capable of holding a civil office who shall not, at the time he [or she] shall be chosen thereto, . . . be a citizen of the United States, a resident of the state, and if it be a local office, a resident of the political subdivision or municipal corporation of the state for which he [or she] shall be chosen, or within which the electors electing him [or her] reside" (emphasis by the… [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
The style of the case is, Windsor Village, Ltd. and Jackob Elbaz v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:47 pm
Not in Farrey v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:38 am
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution keeps government away from operational decisions of churches. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
United States Court of Appeals CRIMINAL OPINIONS Habeas Corpus Confrontation Clause Where a state court judge admitted double hearsay against a defendant as substantive evidence to prove the defendants’ guilt, his federal habeas corpus petition should have been granted. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Vaughan Roofing & Sheet Metal v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, DRC, Inc. v. [read post]
