Search for: "State v. Liberty"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 9,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2010, 1:23 am
State of Karnataka & Ors. (2003) 6 SCC 697. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:14 am
See Connick v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
., v. [read post]
9 Nov 2024, 8:29 am
Lady Liberty and Free Speech imagined by ChatGPT European Court of Human RightsNational Youth Council of Moldova v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:46 am
So let’s move to the next category of state-significant natural communities. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
That should become clearer after the outcome of Liberty’s appeal to the Court of Appeal in its judicial review of the Act and various pending references to the CJEU.Meanwhile the recent Strasbourg judgment in Big Brother Watch v UK (yet to be made final, pending possible referral to the Grand Chamber) has exposed a separate set of flaws in the IP Act’s predecessor legislation, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Maolin Ninth Circuit Opinion (ACLU) United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2025, 6:48 pm
Consider the Supreme Court’s instruction in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:52 pm
IndiaAshutosh Dubey v. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 3:41 pm
Department of State. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm
The elements of the "malfunction" exception to the ordinary burdens of proof in strict liability should be clearly stated and strictly construed by courts. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:04 pm
Section 49 states that an individual who has contravened or failed to comply with an order or the Act is liable to a maximum fine of $10,000 or imprisonment of up to 6 months or both for a first offence and up to additional fines of up to $1,000 a day if the offence continues (fines increase to a maximum of $25,000 or up to 12 months imprisonment for subsequent offences or both and a maximum of $25,000 for each day the offence continues). [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:39 pm
Yesterday in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
HousingHD7288.72.U5 B46 2010Tierra y libertad : land, liberty, and Latino housing / Steven W. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
So in Myers v. [read post]
