Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 6,725,281 entitled SYNCHRONIZATION OF CONTROLLED DEVICE STATE USING STATE TABLE AND EVENTING IN DATA-DRIVEN REMOTE DEVICE CONTROL MODEL and owned by Microsoft. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:33 am
” The complaint is here: https://www.aclu.org/documents/complaint-escalona-v-noem Emergency stay motion: https://www.aclu.org/documents/emergency-stay-motion Memo in support of emergency stay motion: https://www.aclu.org/cases/escalona-v-noem? [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer in his recent powerful dissent in Glossip v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
This seems strongly to indicate that the UNSC has no power to trump ECHR obligations. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am
Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:41 am
Justice Thomas wrote the decision in Culbertson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 4:30 am
Todd Phillips (Georgia State University - J. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:48 am
The transcript of the McDonald v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:12 am
On May 15, 2017, in State of Hawaii v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:44 am
” At Take Care, Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu argue that “both sides miss the central constitutional concern of the Establishment Clause,” which “separates the power of the state from that of communities of faith. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
Again, the context, of course, is the detention by the State of children and young persons. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:27 am
China, India, and other nations continue to build new coal-fired power plants, a move out of step with the transformational action needed to avert irreversible, catastrophic climate harm. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:28 am
We previously blogged in 2014 about Marsico v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:26 am
In Surefoot LC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
In Holt v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:36 am
A. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Especially in view of the 1976 amendment to the FDCA which specified the powers of the Secretary in regulating medical devices, any state law which would put these same powers in other hands must be deemed foreclosed. . . . [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 6:48 pm
They understood that the only way to constrain state power to the norms of the postwar world was to create a constitution that gave rights enforceable priority over ordinary political preferences. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 11:38 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
