Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 13,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 7:58 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:42 am
The FPPC’s position means the following are outside of the scope of the second prong of the Competitive Bidding Process Exemption and, therefore, the exemption would not be available: Communicating with a California state pension plan before an RFP is actually issued, provided, however, that an investment adviser and its personnel may (a) inquire as to whether the state pension plan intends to contract out certain services and (b) respond to inquiries as to the… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
., at the time.Alito said Tuesday that he owned around $2,000 in Disney stock when the court heard the case FCC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:08 pm
The states must have flexibility in their rate-setting methodologies, but they are statutorily required—and should be judicially required—to pay a reasonable price for the services they buy. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
For the view that Harisiades gives the government nearly unlimited immigration power over aliens, see Price v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:47 am
The largest of those routes were between United’s hub airports and Continental’s hub at the Newark airport.The May 23 decision in Malaney v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 5:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
Pentalpha then started selling its fryers to Sunbeam, which resold them in this country under its own trademarks at a price that undercut SEB's. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:15 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:10 am
Pentalpha then started selling its fryers to Sunbeam, which resold them in this country under its own trademarks at a price that undercut SEB's. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:30 am
Benney v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:22 am
” Brief for United States, Timken Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:00 am
Allied Partners, Littman v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 3:05 pm
As long as competitors are not precluded (either through violence or through operation of law) from entering the market, there is nothing wrong with companies having monopolistic power based on their ability to offer to consumers something at such a price that no competitor can match. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am
Kowalski began the 1948 Spring Training season with Pueblo, but before the regular season began he was demoted to the Class B Asheville Tourists of the Tri-State League. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
Sharma v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am
Summers v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:04 pm
Please contact Price Benowitz LLP for a free consultation. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:04 pm
David Benowitz is a criminal defense lawyer in Washington DC and founding partner of Price Benowtiz LLP. [read post]
