Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 40,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2018, 5:33 am
In Miller v Miller, 2018 WL 4008779 (E.D. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
In a 1991 case, Freytag v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:38 am
In the recent decision of Otto Candies, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:32 pm
In Whittaker Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:43 pm
Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:02 am
However, the issue of a passenger's right to challenge the scope of the ensuing investigation had not been specifically addressed until the recent New Mexico Court of Appeals case of State v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 2:15 pm
Friday’s Matwyuk v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:32 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled Monday in Concepcion v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:41 am
The Court of Appeals decision March 14th in the case of Cesar De La Rosa v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 6:31 am
The recent New Mexico Supreme Court case of Delfino v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 12:15 pm
The defendants filed a motion to exclude, which was denied Facts – This case (Bernstein v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
States themselves certify businesses as DBEs. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm
By Jason Starling In what looks to be an ominous development for public-sector unions, the United States Supreme Court, on June 30, 2015, granted a petition for certiorari by the plaintiffs in Friedrichs v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
V. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:03 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
Mozes v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:32 am
Lands Commission v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:32 pm
" Ford v. [read post]
