Search for: "U.S. v. Best*"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 13,312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 6:34 pm
In two recent decisions, U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
At best, this definition was confusing; at worst, it was wrong. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
The U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:57 pm
And the key authority they cite for that proposition is the Supreme Court’s 1982 decision in Upham v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 11:43 am
Women’s health is under attack—here, there, and everywhere.Domestically, we see Trump’s pick of a Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, who he suspects might vote to overturn Roe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:57 am
Times v.] [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm
A key response to the 2008 financial crisis, the CFPB is the first federal agency with the sole goal of protecting consumers of the U.S. financial services industry. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
As Philip Lacovara, who served as counsel to Jaworski and argued U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
An analogous situation could soon arise with the Presidential Succession Act of 1947, now codified at 3 U.S. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm
The Clerk shall close the file.Judge Koh's underlying findings of fact and conclusions of law, however, span 233 pages (this post continues below the document):19-05-21 FTC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:09 pm
Takushi (1992) and Anderson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm
A key response to the 2008 financial crisis, the CFPB is the first federal agency with the sole goal of protecting consumers of the U.S. financial services industry. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:03 am
A&E Television Networks, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Gravel v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am
In response to public outcry, the order instead requires the secretary of homeland security to detain immigrant families together “to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations” and directs the Justice Department to amend the consent decree reached in Flores v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am
Tillis's efforts to distance himself from (at least) the proposed overruling of the eBay v. [read post]
