Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 13,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2021, 10:20 am
Berni v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:33 pm
Once the FTC pursues a PI against Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard, it will have a hard time persuading a federal judge of its market and product category definitions.Based on the FTC's market definition, Judge Davila of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California "Court finds that—regardless of the metrics used—every one of these ratios reflect a market concentration well above what the Merger Guidelines have designated as… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:03 pm
Might I suggest you take a look at Lundeen Coatings, Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
” Bissonnette v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The Role of the Jury in Criminal Trials Juries have played a central role in trials at least as far back as the Thirteenth Century, and were solidly part of the English system at the time of the founding of the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Because class actions are out of control in California, there are lots more ascertainability cases in Ninth Circuit district courts that we haven't cited. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
California Appellate Districts, April 09, 2008 Salma v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:29 am
Then on Tuesday, February 27, the Court gets another big case, United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:33 am
The United States Supreme court in South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:33 am
The United States Supreme court in South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 5:24 am
The bill would also restore the United States to a first-to-invent system, as we had before the U.S. changed to a first-to-file system at the Patent Office in a compromise to effectively harmonize our patent laws with those in most other countries around the world. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:21 pm
It seems that he was wrong on that account too, at least according to the majority of the United State Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:39 am
In Aeromar, the parties are respectively located in Mexico and California, not a great distance but the Complainant offered no evidence that at the time the domain name was registered its reputation had traveled to the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:05 am
Supreme Court in MedellÃÂn v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:17 pm
[v] U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
New York politicians are expected to vote to force the city’s police force to divulge the surveillance technology it uses, one of many reforms of law enforcement being considered across the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 10:47 am
Russoniello v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:48 pm
More to come. (5:48 pm ET) http://www.eswr.com/docs/cts/cca9/deltasmeltop_10-15192_32511.pdf From ESWR page First graf of opinion: “In this appeal, we consider whether application of sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act to the California delta smelt violates the Commerce Clause in the United States Constitution. [read post]
