Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 16,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit 2010) (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 8:31 am
Payan v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:35 pm
Stalling is something else: even though the Chief Justice of the United States had granted Samsung an extension until March 29 for a petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
McConnell, a former judge on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, is also a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
United States and Dean v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:22 am
United HealthCare Services In essence, that is what the circuit court did in Grant. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:56 am
ShareThe Supreme Court on Wednesday morning agreed to review a ruling by a federal appeals court that would significantly restrict (but not eliminate altogether) access to a drug used in medication abortions, which account for over half of all abortions performed in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
Millett, Assistant to the Solicitor General, argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of respondent. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:16 am
He calls the majority’s decision "indefensible," and describes the proceedings as following "a course more fitting a kangaroo court than a court of the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:34 pm
We hold (and clarify) today that the Sentencing Guidelines permit use of hearsay testimony so long as the overall record provides “sufficient indicia of reliability”—and we conclude that the indicia of reliability here are sufficient.Next up is United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:31 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Sentence Is Vacated, Remanded; Court's Notice Of Upward Departure from Guidelines Insufficient United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
Based in Oakbrook Terrace and Chicago, we represent clients of all sizes throughout the states of Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin, and throughout the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:28 am
United States, 985 F.2d 1574, 1582 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
(following Mendez) with United States v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:30 am
Google) http://t.co/H9xBhLQDlO -> Federal Circuit: Software is not Patent Eligible unless Claimed as a Process or Physical Object http://t.co/AvXtpKtY9O -> Some Modest Proposals for Legislative Change http://t.co/6zAVOiUA8F -> The right to be forgotten one year on, what next? [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 9:27 pm
The court now invites the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to file a brief expressing his views on the following issue: what, if any, deference should be afforded to decisions of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board Precedential Opinion Panel (“POP”), and specifically to the POP opinion in Proppant Express Investments, LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 2:26 am
"
FEDERAL DECISIONS:
United States v. [read post]
