Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 9621 - 9640 of 16,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2012, 10:41 pm by Leland E. Beck
Agency Brand X Interpretation:  Judge Bybee summed up court deference to agency interpretation that conflicts with prior court decisions for the en banc Ninth Circuit in Garfias-Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am by Chris Castle
  Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 7:12 pm by Record on Appeal
  Under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Faragher v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 9:25 am by pfurey
United States, the Second Circuit concluded that laws discriminating against gays and lesbians were subject to "heightened" or "intermediate scrutiny" under the Constitution. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 7:27 am by Mark M. Campanella, Esq.
Less than a month after hearing oral arguments, the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals (situated in New York City) has struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as violative of the U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:42 am by Steve Davies
Plaintiffs assert that the Finding resembles the finding vacated and remanded by Judge Kollar-Kotelly in WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:07 pm
  A panel of the Ninth Circuit in Miranda B. adopted a particular standard on this issue by quoting from a purported en banc opinion written by Chief Judge Kozinski, with a citation to "United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
 The Washington Post quotes the investigation as stating that “Huawei and ZTE have failed to assuage the committee’s significant security concerns presented by their continued expansion into the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 5:59 am by jadamengel
The plaintiff’s complaint in Mendenhall alleged, inter alia, that the speed camera ordinance in Akron violated Due Process and Fifth Amendment rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 5:59 am by jadamengel
The plaintiff’s complaint in Mendenhall alleged, inter alia, that the speed camera ordinance in Akron violated Due Process and Fifth Amendment rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Last Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari to review the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in McReynolds v. [read post]