Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 9621 - 9640 of 14,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2012, 3:51 am by Leland E. Beck
  Judge Wilkins, of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, threw out litigation alleging the “public trust” doctrine as a predicate to mandating federal rulemaking to restrict greenhouse gases in Alec L. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 3:09 pm by Steve Statsinger
The court accordingly remanded for a de novo sentencing.United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of VirginiaOpinion Date: 5/17/12Cite: Capital One Fin. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm by Amy Howe
  The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:13 am by Greg Jacobs
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s recent ruling in CBX Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am by Tonya Gisselberg
Downing, the Deputy Chief for Computer Crime at the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section at the United State Department of Justice, was the second speaker on the panel. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:41 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In support, Frito-Lay pointed to OFCCP v United Space Alliance, LLC, in which the ARB, on April 11, 2011, issued a “Notice of Case Closing” because  the ARB did not issue a “Final Decision and Order” within 30 days after the time for filing exceptions under the expedited hearing procedures. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am by Kedar Bhatia
United States, and three times during the Affordable Care Act cases. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:56 am by Rosalind English
Therefore he could have no “reasonable expectation” of privacy and Article 8 had not been engaged (X v UK (application No 5877/72) [1973], Friedl v Austria (1995) 21 EHRR 83 and Friend v UK [2010] EHRR SE6). [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:00 pm by Josephine Liu
  We will be following developments closely. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:07 pm by Roger Alford
As Chevron put it in a statement today, “If the plaintiffs’ lawyers believed in the integrity of their judgment, they would be seeking enforcement in the United States – where Chevron Corporation resides. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:30 am by Cassandra Burke Robertson
Plaintiffs may be somewhat less likely to file suit in the United States. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-955Issue(s): Whether the McCormick v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:41 am by amy.burchfield@law.csuohio.edu
Chevron Deference In this lesson, we explore issues relating to the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:05 am by Jon Hyman
Could this conflict among the circuits now head to the United States Supreme Court for resolution? [read post]