Search for: "A. Jackson" Results 9641 - 9660 of 27,937
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Justice Jackson noted it in his classic separate opinion in Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
” Remarkably, Jackson was referring to grade school students, and the court rightly held that forcing patriotism on little ones was both unconstitutional and foolish. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:21 pm by BARBRI
#The1Llife Make A Calendar GUEST BLOG by Jackson Long, 1L at SMU Dedman School of Law Go schedule out your last 21 days with precision. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:03 pm by Elim
., Jackson and Powell on Professional Liability, 8th ed. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:21 am
.- Senior Counsel, Kohrman, Jackson & KrantzBecoming the “owner” of real estate is not quite as difficult as acquiring a wicked witch’s broom, but it is somewhat of a labored journey.The seemingly simple answer to the question of when one becomes the owner of real estate is: when title is transferred by way of a deed. [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 7:28 am by Jim Walker
The man was experiencing chest pains and was flown to the Miami-based air station, where EMS personnel drove him to Jackson Memorial Hospital. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm by HRWatchdog
SB 63 (Jackson; D-Santa Barbara) Imposes New Maternity and Paternity Leave Mandate — Would require small employers with as few as 20 employees to provide 12 weeks of protected employee leave for child bonding and exposes them to the threat of costly litigation. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:18 am by Jessica Feinstein
Please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney if you have any questions. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:06 am by Holly Johnston, Esq.
Lakeesha Ransom, Dean, University of Akron Williams Honors College; Chanel Jackson, Graduate Assistant; Chris Burton, Treasurer, WHCAB; Neil Bernard, scholarship recipient; Holly Johnston, Secretary, WHCAB; Derek Daily, WHCAB; Lynn Lalley Wagers, Chair, WHCAB; Laura Defrain, WHCAB   [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” In all likelihood, the president is laying the groundwork for (1) defying future judicial orders (as Trump’s now-favorite predecessor-in-office Andrew Jackson was said to have threatened to do); and (2) preemptively blaming the federal judiciary for the next terrorist attack (“Because the ban was lifted by a judge, many very bad and dangerous people may be pouring into our country. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:17 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Jackson and John Travolta, you may have noticed that all the clocks in the entire Quentin Tarantino film were set to 4:20. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:59 pm
I'm confident that LA. attorney Michael Maroko cares more about the substance of this opinion than its caption. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Whether the Court should make a declaration of incompatibility under 4 of the HRA 1998 in relation to the 1999 Act regime, or even in respect of the costs regime which applies following LASPO and the Defamation Act 2013 (Declaration of incompatibility). (1) The rule in MGN v UK in domestic law Lord Neuberger made the following points about Strasbourg’s decision in MGN v UK: The ECtHR’s decision was “full and careful” and its reasons “largely sound,” and,… [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 11:43 am by BARBRI
GUEST BLOG by Jackson Long, 1L at SMU Dedman School of Law Many of my upper-class mentors have stressed the importance of staying on top of your scheduling for the last two years. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:08 am by AIDAN WILLS, MATRIX
Whether the Court should make a declaration of incompatibility under HRA 1998, s 4 in relation to the Access to Justice Act 1999, or even in respect of the costs regime which applies following LASPO and the Defamation Act 2013 (Declaration of incompatibility). (1) The rule in MGN v UK in domestic law Lord Neuberger considered that ECtHR’s decision in MGN v UK was “full and careful” and its reasons “largely sound” (based primarily on Sir Rupert Jackson’s… [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Justice Hugo Black Justice Robert Jackson dissented, expressing his view that the military ruling had no place in law under the Constitution. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Robert Jackson presciently observed in 1952 in the Steel Seizure Case, “power to legislate for emergencies belongs in the hands of Congress, but only Congress itself can prevent power from slipping through its fingers. [read post]