Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 9641 - 9660
of 32,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2017, 4:25 pm
But once someone else grabs the car, now it's carjacking if you don't immediately stop.Not what I would have thought carjacking entails.But definitely the law in California now. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:38 pm
You filed a habeas petition over your 5-year prison sentence for drug violations, claiming that an appropriations rider passed by Congress prevents the U.S. from spending money to incarcerate you for growing medical marijuana in compliance with California law. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 5:14 pm
California - The U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:54 pm
Appellants misstate facts and law (despite taking almost a year to prepare the opening brief) and fail to support each factual assertion in their brief with a citation to the record, as required by California Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1)(C). [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:37 pm
The California Court of Appeal holds that it does. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 2:05 pm
At no point has the government meaningfully analyzed Bocharnikov’s first encounter with law enforcement to help us determine what sort of violation occurred. . . . [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:47 am
(Other states with similar laws include: Alaska, California, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, New Jersey, North Dakota and Oregon.) [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:00 pm
" Under these circumstances, such waivers are unconscionable under California law and should not be enforced.'" (Concepcion, at p. 1746, italics added.) [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 5:28 am
Randall Peerenboom (University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law) has posted More Law, Less Courts: Legalized Governance Judicialization and Dejudicialization in China on SSRN. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Southern California Gas Co., 116 Cal. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:20 pm
” Following a 2007 California Court of Appeal decision, ACS Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:05 am
It wouldn’t surprise me if a California court, more familiar with California’s anti-SLAPP law, would have given a lot more anti-SLAPP credit to Filer. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (R. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:34 am
Finally, this part of the book discusses the impact of the ruling in Regents of the University of California v Eli Lilly & Co and how this case has influenced the application of the written description requirement in the US. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:45 am
The case is Beaty v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:40 pm
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, in which the Court is considering whether federal bankruptcy law preempts a Puerto Rico law intended to allow the commonwealth’s public utilities to restructure their debts. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 6:00 pm
Zieff, of Rudy, Exelrod & Zieff, along with seven other law firms. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:27 pm
Ms Henriques was cross-examined by Ms Laws QC. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:44 pm
The decision comes in a case called Cross v. [read post]
