Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9641 - 9660
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2010, 5:48 am
The wife made an application to the English court for financial provision after a marriage had been dissolved in a foreign country, under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm
Audiocast and some materials on the FTC website. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:49 pm
" In the case of Florida v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:53 am
Here's the first sentence from Dockery v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
In Apache v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 4:37 am
It's available in various official European Union languages, including Latvian, but not in English. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:26 am
So what do these sections actually say in plain English? [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:30 am
I’ve been away for two weeks; hence, no Plain English posts. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:39 am
Well, at least in the case of the State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:23 pm
Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:41 pm
The US Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the interesting Georgia privacy case of LFP Publishing Group v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
The bill includes fatigue study information and workplace safety and health protections, cabin air quality provisions that would identify the equipment and technologies available to detect and filter highly toxic contaminants in the air supply, English language standards for flight attendants, and a “Return to the Cabin” program that would allow flight attendants an opportunity for rehabilitation after testing positive for drug or alcohol abuse. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
Plaintiff is not a fluent English speaker, so she asked her uncle Mr. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 9:48 pm
After nearly three years of discovery, the parties in the massive Viacom v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:31 am
For a link to the panel decision, Lautsi v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
In addition, this case did not fall within the exceptions contained in Arts 4(2) and (3).This is believed to be the first decision in which the English court has applied Rome II since it came into effect in all EU member states (except Denmark) in January 2009. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
In addition, this case did not fall within the exceptions contained in Arts 4(2) and (3).This is believed to be the first decision in which the English court has applied Rome II since it came into effect in all EU member states (except Denmark) in January 2009. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:34 am
Gulf International Ltd v Groupe Chimique Tunisien Court of Appeal “An English court could restrain a party to a contract governed by English law from instituting any action in a foreign court contrary to an arbitration agreement in the contract. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
Here is the abstract:In 2004, Crawford v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
Patrick Charles, a Cleveland-Marshall alumnus, published his article “Arms for Their Defence: An Historical, Legal, and Textual Analysis of the English Right to Have Arms and Whether the Second Amendment Should Be Incorporated in McDonald v. [read post]
