Search for: "John Doe V" Results 9641 - 9660 of 14,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 5:32 am by Susan Brenner
Code] § 5362(2) provides that the `business of betting or wagering’ `does not include the activities of a financial transaction provider . . . [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
Titles V and VI - Relaxation of mandatory Exchange Act registration standard for record holders Increases number of record holders triggering mandatory registration to 2,000, no more than 500 of which may be unaccredited Excludes holders of employee benefit plan securities Increases thresholds for bank holding companies Implementation: Effective immediately. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm by James Hamilton
John Carney (D-DE), would create a new category of issuer, a new entity in the federal securities law, the emerging growth company, which would retain that status for five years or until it exceeds $1 billion in annual gross revenue or becomes a large accelerated filer. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:56 am by Paul Horwitz
But he notes, accurately, that Vanderbilt draws on the Supreme Court's decision in CLS v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:26 am by scanner1
THE CITY OF MISSOULA, MONTANA; THE MISSOULA CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants and Appellees, v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm by Glenn
Earlier this term, the Court handed down a decision in Mims v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:45 am by Jess Bravin
Chief Justice John Roberts cited that assurance in his opinion for the court, Nken v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am by admin
Petitioners John and Irene Yee own the Friendly Hills and Sunset Terrace Mobile Home Parks, both of which are located in the city of Escondido. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:21 am by Kendall Gray
And courts have been doing that since John Marshall's 19th century judo throw--Marbury v. [read post]