Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9641 - 9660
of 16,588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2013, 9:39 am
You can read the speech here (there are even little breaks throughout marked as “applause” in case you want to pretend like you were actually there). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
No, he didn’t. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:53 pm
Do its markings at all suggest that the device isn’t a microphone? [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:15 am
Any "creative spark" counts, "no matter how crude [or] humble." [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
But Elkins didn’t talk to prosecutors previously about audio feed matters to third parties, despite his knowledge of where audio feeds from the courtroom traveled. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 12:20 pm
On further proceedings, defendants renewed their argument that Medimport lacked rights because they weren’t using the mark in the US. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 7:47 am
Mark Martins. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 6:31 am
There is a good story by Adam Gopnik in the current New Yorker about Galileo--next year marks the 450th anniversary of his birth and there are several new books about him. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:49 am
What is the likely meaning of the matter in question, taking into account not only dictionary definitions, but also the relationship of the matter to the other elements in the mark, the nature of the goods or services, and the manner in which the mark is used in the marketplace in connection with the goods and services; and2. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 12:45 am
” Though the emails unquestionably do not read well, “bad publicity doesn’t necessarily equate to a defeat in court. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
[T]here is a lot of stuff out there that’s highly offensive that’s put out on a spontaneous basis. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:52 am
So no matter what, the recall couldn’t constitute a violation (and thus support a parallel claim) of a nonexistent FDA specification, and to the extent the plaintiff claimed ion permeability should have been a PMA spec, well, that& [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 11:51 pm
Not because of their political philosophy, I couldn’t give a toss about politics myself, (I hold strongly to the belief that no matter who you vote for the government always gets in). [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:07 am
See Marks, 319 S.W.3d at 662. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
The plea concerning Article 7(3), which excludes the applicability of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) if the trade mark has acquired distinctiveness through use, was declared inadmissible, as the Board of Appeal had not ruled on the matter, but merely remitted the question to the Examination Division. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
If you are going to refer the matter, put that in your ad. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
If you are going to refer the matter, put that in your ad. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 4:05 am
As I said in TNR: And the legal details matter. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 3:28 am
These vary from law firms to non-attorney service companies which typically also handle patent matters. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:02 pm
I would be much grateful if you could advise me on this matter. [read post]
