Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General"
Results 9641 - 9660
of 14,178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
That is the great tragedy, for example, in the current litigation among the former university President, the former university general counsel and the university over the role of the general counsel and the character of advice she provided. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
Norberg v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
This, of course, is entirely consistent with the General Assembly having intended that `individual’ refer to a natural person, not a corporation.Martinez v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 2:49 pm
Frelo v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
Remarkably, the Court describes the Attorney General as ‘amicus’ [21]. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 2:44 am
In People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:54 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has released its decision in Attorney General of Canada, et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Thus, decisions by counsel are generally given effect as to what arguments to pursue, see Jones v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
, 510 U.S. 135 (1994) (`A term appearing in several places in a statutory text is generally read the same way each time it appears. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:30 pm
The Respondents, a group of prostitutes and former prostitutes, argued that a number of Criminal Code provisions prohibiting expression and commercial activities relating to prostitution were in breach of Sections 7 and 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Continue reading → [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
Instead, the prosecutor reads the law to the grand jury and generally runs the show. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse (2013 J.Q. no. 12486) (24 September); General Motors of Canada Limited v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:09 am
Cooper v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:09 am
(Berlinger v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:14 pm
Perelman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
However, in its December 5, 2013 opinion in Venecia V. v August V., the Appellate Division, First Department, held that no malpractice had been committed, and no hearing was required to reach that conclusion. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:42 am
Hankston v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 1:02 pm
(You can read the letter for yourself here.) [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:57 pm
Online Transactions Moderator: Ann Chaitovitz, Attorney‐Advisor for Copyright, Office of Policy and International Affairs, USPTO Comments generally agreed that online markets should be left to private markets. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
And this would harm not only students, but also academic and professional discourse more generally. [read post]
