Search for: "State v. Long" Results 9641 - 9660 of 45,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 7:40 am by Howard of Franklin
Supreme Judicial Court ruled yesterday that police may secretly break into a suspect's vehicle and install a GPS tracking device if the state first obtains a valid warrant.In an unanimous decision, the court decided in Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:04 am by axd10
App. 2001) • Identifies the potential for same-sex couples to use surrogacy agreements, as long as the contract is enforceable Belsito v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) Virginia was one of several states that enacted a strong eminent domain reform law after the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
’” If the acts involving the statute’s focus occur in the United States, then the statute applies. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
’” If the acts involving the statute’s focus occur in the United States, then the statute applies. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 1:28 pm by APransky
We now have the benefit of the first case to interpret the new law.In the case of Holmes v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Mencken’s constitution.Al Brophy (UNC Law) has posted some thoughts on the famous case State v. [read post]