Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 9641 - 9660
of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2025, 3:17 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Seila Law v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 11:37 am
United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 8:41 am
The states’ lawsuit argues further that the FLSA delegates too much power to the DOL and that the 1986 decision extending the FLSA to the states, Garcia v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:00 pm
California State University, Chico (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 985 (Bonn) and Kistler v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:02 am
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:55 am
In this case, Patton v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Especially in view of the 1976 amendment to the FDCA which specified the powers of the Secretary in regulating medical devices, any state law which would put these same powers in other hands must be deemed foreclosed. . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Especially in view of the 1976 amendment to the FDCA which specified the powers of the Secretary in regulating medical devices, any state law which would put these same powers in other hands must be deemed foreclosed. . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Especially in view of the 1976 amendment to the FDCA which specified the powers of the Secretary in regulating medical devices, any state law which would put these same powers in other hands must be deemed foreclosed. . . . [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
”) (emphasis added); United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 3:27 am
The controversy turns an interpretation of Cleveland v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
The administration's policy could potentially offset some of the negative effects of the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 10:21 am
The case of Taylor v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 7:54 pm
FERREN C. v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 10:46 am
., Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:07 pm
See Meyer v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:59 am
Cooper, in which the court held on Monday that the Constitution did not give Congress the power to revoke the states’ immunity from suit for copyright infringement in a 1990 law, concluding that the decision “is significant for states in the big picture because the court held the line on its sovereign immunity precedent,” but “as a practical matter, the impact of this case is probably limited. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:34 pm
The case is US v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Wisconsin’s case—Wolf v. [read post]
