Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 9641 - 9660
of 15,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 12:47 pm
But Dubov simply said that: [T]he Court [in D.C. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:24 am
In Dauksis v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:43 pm
But a state that is engaged in armed conflict or in legitimate self-defense is not required to provide targets with legal process before the state may use lethal force. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 6:26 pm
Laws governing time off to vote can be found in 31 states. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:39 am
In the case mentioned above that was filed recently in New York, the plaintiffs are relying on a 2008 New York State Court of Appeals case, Samiento v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:21 am
In McCoy v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Massachusetts and Zucht v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 3:49 am
Case Name: Schultz v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
In a country (and culture) that sometimes appears to believe that prevention of even one terrorist attack justifies immense costs in terms both of money and deprivations of ordinary liberty, it is at least worth noting the remarkable indifference of much of the public—and certainly the whole of the Republican Party—to the costs attached to offering the kind of capacious interpretation of the Second Amendment instantiated in the recent case of New York State Rifle & Pistol… [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:06 am
Looking back at Griswold v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself: “If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:12 am
In Moge v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:47 am
Here is the abstract: The self-congratulatory tone of the majority and concurring opinions in last term’s controversial Supreme Court blockbuster, Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:07 pm
Bush, Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 11:23 pm
Instead, in a society that holds among its most cherished ambitions mutual respect, tolerance, self-rule, and democratic responsibility, an "offended viewer" may "avert his eyes," Erznoznik v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: The self-congratulatory tone of the majority and concurring opinions in last term’s controversial Supreme Court blockbuster, Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:19 am
Vogt, which asks whether a probable cause hearing is part of a criminal case within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment’s self-incrimination clause. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
” Graham v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:16 pm
LeBlanc v. [read post]
