Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 9641 - 9660
of 10,392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2008, 4:30 am
United States, the court considered whether a taxpayer could bring a tax-refund suit in a federal district court if he did not first pay all of the taxes sought by the Treasury. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Reassuringly it affirms that Creative Commons is not an anti-copyright device but a provider of handy guidance to would-be users, and it doesn't threaten readers with Moorhouse v University of New South Wales, choosing to explain the legal position instead. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:44 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
William Downey, Managing Director at W J Downey & Associates and graduate (cum laude) from the Saint Georges School of Law (1996), said, In Antigua v United States, the World Trade Organization (WTO) said the United States could restrict online gambling on sporting events, but could not prohibit offshore companies from offering online betting on horse racing. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:13 am
The complaint asserts that since Red Bull's introduction in 1996, over four billion units have been sold in the United States and over one billion dollars have been spent on advertising, marketing and promoting the Red Bull energy drink. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:30 am
Moore a/k/a Sheik Mark Stanton Moore-El,' rather than 'Sheik Mark Stanton Moore-El a/k/a Mark S. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its… [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:50 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
App. 1979) (citations and quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:51 pm
Section 1498(b) of title 28, United States Code, contains the waiver of immunity for copyright infringement. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 6:40 am
In Sherrod v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:01 pm
’ (internal quotation marks removed). [read post]
