Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 9641 - 9660 of 24,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2021, 9:08 pm by Michael Lomtevas
According to a report by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), aquaculture production could increase dramatically in the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:52 am
Evid. 803(6) and United States v Catabran, 836 F.2d 453, 457 (9th Cir. 1988). [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 6:02 pm by Joy Waltemath
In May, he was transferred back to his paramedic unit after he agreed to undergo a physical exam by his own doctor, but refused to provide the actual test results (including bloodwork and x-rays). [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Elina Saxena
Data Protection Commissioner earlier this week—a ruling, which in addition to impacting data movement between the European Union and the United States, also made a splash on Lawfare. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by David Markus
Judge Wilson, joined by a visiting judge, issued this opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
  Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Kirk Jenkins
 The Appellate Court acknowledged that neither the Illinois appellate courts nor the United States Supreme Court had ever adopted the doctrine, but suggested that Doe might provide an appropriate vehicle for the Illinois Supreme Court to do so. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Kirk Jenkins
 The Appellate Court acknowledged that neither the Illinois appellate courts nor the United States Supreme Court had ever adopted the doctrine, but suggested that Doe might provide an appropriate vehicle for the Illinois Supreme Court to do so. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am by The Charge
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]