Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 9661 - 9680 of 48,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2015, 9:50 am
We therefore give the parties liberty to apply to a single judge of the Patents Court of the High Court should that appear likely.CostsThere are fairly complex submissions on costs, because on the one hand Convatec has ultimately prevailed, and so is in principle entitled to its costs, but on the other hand Smith & Nephew argue that Convatec withdrew at a late stage a large part of some aspects of their case in respect of which Smith & Nephew had incurred substantial… [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
The cost of a name-change. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:20 am by Michael Risch
But analytically, when we are considering the value of the public domain, we are valuing two different things if they are lumped together: we are valuing expiry v. dedication/licensing.3. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 12:35 am by Kevin LaCroix
In considering the insurer’s position, Judge Casper reviewed a number of cases -- including in particular the Fourth Circuit’s February 2012 opinion in Republic Franklin Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:15 am by CMS
In this case, Catherine McAndrew, a Senior Associate in the Insurance and Reinsurance team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in TUI Limited v Griffiths [2023] UKSC 48I, which was handed down on 29 November 2023. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
I think that invitations to individuals to speak in classrooms and other nonpublic parts of campus—invitations that a university didn’t have to extend in the first place—should be rescindable on account of anticipated cost. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:59 pm by Sara Moran
The Court also gave directions on the scope of orders for delivery up or destruction of infringing goods, disclosure of information on Kymab’s infringing products, and costs. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:48 am by INFORRM
The net effect is that the reasonable copying costs of the LA were to be paid by Ms Newman, but the more substantive costs of redacting the documents the LA were ordered to disclose were to be borne by the LA. [read post]