Search for: "Court v. State" Results 9661 - 9680 of 208,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
The Court stated that although the Promise Doctrine is viewed as uniquely Canadian, it has its roots in English law in Hatmaker v Joseph ((1919) 36 PRC 231) and Re Alsop's Patent ((1907) 24 RPC 733 - "false suggestion or representation") where, the now extinct doctrine the Court referred to as the "False Promise Doctrine" derived. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
The Court stated that although the Promise Doctrine is viewed as uniquely Canadian, it has its roots in English law in Hatmaker v Joseph ((1919) 36 PRC 231) and Re Alsop's Patent ((1907) 24 RPC 733 - "false suggestion or representation") where, the now extinct doctrine the Court referred to as the "False Promise Doctrine" derived. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:37 am by psmoeller
In so ruling, the Court reaffirmed the constitutional right to have an abortion first established in Roe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:50 am by James Carmichael
Oil States v Greene’s Energy, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), just decided that patents are a public right, a franchise right, akin to a right to erect a toll bridge, and not personal property (slip op. at 9). [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am by Robert Brammer
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:06 am by Beth Graham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has issued an opinion stating the availability of class arbitration is a threshold question for the courts, not an arbitrator, to decide. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:00 am
., and Short's Concrete Cutting Co. recently secured a victory in the Iowa Supreme Court when the Court, in Star Equipment, Ltd., v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court's discussion of the UCL claim in Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:31 pm
Justices Rule Guantanamo Bay Detainees Can File Suit in Federal Courts BOUMEDIENE V. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:12 pm
Smith, an important Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause property rights case that was heard by the Supreme Court today: Today, the Supreme Court hears Alvarez v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:32 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously Thursday in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 10:52 am by getnickadmin
The United States Supreme Court announced that it would hear a case to resolve an issue that has vexed – and split – lower courts under the U.S. [read post]