Search for: "Does 1-30" Results 9661 - 9680 of 27,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2019, 3:09 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  Minnesota Statute Section 169A.54, subd. 1 provides that the revocation or cancellation period can range from 90 days to 6 years for a third degree DWI conviction if a driver does not hold a commercial driver’s license. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 5:02 am
By default, if the credit grantor does not verify the debt within that 30 day period, the item must be removed from your credit report. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 3:11 am by Tessa Shepperson
But how does it affect landlords and tenants? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:45 am by DaytonDUI
  A third offense requires a minimum of 30 days in jail. [read post]
27 May 2021, 3:03 am by Lynn Jokela
It came at no small cost – this has been one of the most expensive proxy fights ever, with Exxon spending at least $35 million and Engine No. 1 spending $30 million. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am by Dave
  Lloyd LJ made clear that section 49A(1)(d) does not allow the council to leave the question of Sam’s accommodation over to be dealt with under Part 7 (at [30]).The next issue concerned remedy and this is an equally important part of the judgment because the Court decided not to set aside the possession order or dismiss the proceedings. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am by Dave
Lloyd LJ made clear that section 49A(1)(d) does not allow the council to leave the question of Sam’s accommodation over to be dealt with under Part 7 (at [30]).The next issue concerned remedy and this is an equally important part of the judgment because the Court decided not to set aside the possession order or dismiss the proceedings.  [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am by Dave
  Lloyd LJ made clear that section 49A(1)(d) does not allow the council to leave the question of Sam’s accommodation over to be dealt with under Part 7 (at [30]).The next issue concerned remedy and this is an equally important part of the judgment because the Court decided not to set aside the possession order or dismiss the proceedings. [read post]