Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 9661 - 9680
of 30,503
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
By all means therefore, the list is merely illustrative and not comprehensive, and could cover additional disciplines.[11] If a decision is made that the object does meet one or more of the Waverley Criteria, the export licence is not outright refused; rather, a delay period, generally in between two to six months, is granted in order to allow an offer to be made at or above the market price (the ‘fair market price’[12]) The right of the Committee to deny an export licence is… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
By all means therefore, the list is merely illustrative and not comprehensive, and could cover additional disciplines.[11] If a decision is made that the object does meet one or more of the Waverley Criteria, the export licence is not outright refused; rather, a delay period, generally in between two to six months, is granted in order to allow an offer to be made at or above the market price (the ‘fair market price’[12]) The right of the Committee to deny an export licence is… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
By all means therefore, the list is merely illustrative and not comprehensive, and could cover additional disciplines.[11] If a decision is made that the object does meet one or more of the Waverley Criteria, the export licence is not outright refused; rather, a delay period, generally in between two to six months, is granted in order to allow an offer to be made at or above the market price (the ‘fair market price’[12]) The right of the Committee to deny an export licence is… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
By all means therefore, the list is merely illustrative and not comprehensive, and could cover additional disciplines.[11] If a decision is made that the object does meet one or more of the Waverley Criteria, the export licence is not outright refused; rather, a delay period, generally in between two to six months, is granted in order to allow an offer to be made at or above the market price (the ‘fair market price’[12]) The right of the Committee to deny an export licence is… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
Jurisprudence has evolved in the UK, Germany, Netherlands and other member states. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
Hostetler v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:40 am
” And yet, since the landmark decision in 2002 in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:09 am
The Claimant has, in the current state, no right to claim recall and destruction of the infringing products. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 9:31 pm
” Keefe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 9:31 pm
” Keefe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Section 9 provides that: The section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled (a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
Depos v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:22 pm
NCAA and Dawson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 9:43 am
The court in this case relied on a 2013 decision, C.G. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 7:04 am
See Munshower v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
Truglio v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:08 pm
This was described by the Court in Multani v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
Mr Gayle’s barrister complained that the defendant’s claim that it did not get a fair trial caused further harm to his client’s reputation. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]
