Search for: "Little v State"
Results 9661 - 9680
of 23,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2010, 3:06 am
I am heartbroken today because a little girl with a fatal disease called Giant Axonal Neuropathy did not win the Pepsi Refresh Challenge to fund a clinical trial that just might save her life….. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 1:00 am
When you adopt a cute little puppy, you never imagine your furry friend could bite or attack someone. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:01 am
Here is a little background. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:16 am
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:21 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
The legality of nationwide banking practice regarding overdraft and non-sufficient fund fees has been challenged for nearly twenty years, with little success. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 5:31 pm
That’s exactly what happened in United States v. [read post]
North Florida Court Did Not Err in Ending Supervised Release for Domestic Violence – U.S. v. Johnson
9 May 2012, 7:09 am
That was the case in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:03 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of FloridaOpinion Date: 1/5/11Cite: Marlite, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:26 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of New HampshireOpinion Date: 2/10/11Cite: ANSYS, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
In the challenge by 26 states to Congress’s decision in the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid coverage — an expansion that the states claim will simply bust their budgets – the states are relying upon the so-called “coercion theory.” This has to do with the conditions that Congress tells states they must meet in order to qualify for federal funds to help pay for a public program. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
First, a lead agency can reasonably conclude that a project which exceeds state energy efficiency standards has a less than significant impact. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
“[T]he location of the parties’ attorneys is accorded little weight in determining a forum non conveniens motion. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 2:54 pm
See Hagen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
This will require a little math, but it is relatively straightforward. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:04 pm
Cal. 2011), and U.S. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:29 pm
In Hypertouch v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 2:12 pm
My instinct is that the evidence is likely to differ in those two cases with state v. federal overlapping enforcement generating larger and more robust negative effects (and little or no effect as between the federal agencies). [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
This is especially true now, after a recent case from the Appellate Division called State v. [read post]
