Search for: "People v Goode" Results 9661 - 9680 of 22,566
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2015, 8:08 am by Leslie Griffin
Those Catholic women’s interests, not the Sisters’, should tip the scale toward the government in Zubik v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
The government alleges that many, if not most, of those people never received anything in return for their money.U.S. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Supreme Court watchers could be forgiven if last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
His interpretation of the Annex contradicts the most basic cannon of treaty interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the law of treaties, which states in Article 31 that “A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 12:21 pm by Mark Rumold
While that’s good for the privacy of those unwittingly swept up in the program, it's bad news for criminal defendants. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
Under the proposed guidance, `orders, modifications, or cancellations’ would not be considered spoofing if `submitted as part of a legitimate, good-faith attempt to consummate a trade. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
Mark reports.* Looking back over this GreeKat shoulder… Part III: The “People’s Car” in the people’s dismayNikos reflects over the recent disgraces in which the poor Volks Wagen has been recently involved. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:18 pm
You can charge older people more for goods and services than young people because the former have more money than the latter.So holds the Court of Appeal.I'm sure that the fancy-schmancy "luxury health" fitness club in the Bay Area here decided to charge 18 to 29 year-olds a (much) lower monthly fee than its older patrons because they were concerned that single people in their 20s in the Bay Area had much lower disposable income than their regular… [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:13 am by Kate Fort
In addition, there’s good language for the eventual ICWA regulations. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:59 am by Joy Waltemath
The Board had good reason for its new approach in Oakwood—namely, “to further its mandate to protect workers” and to provide predictable standards for adjudicating the question. [read post]