Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 9661 - 9680 of 12,221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Fifth in the series is a discussion of the Implicit Minority Discount (IMD) which took root in Delaware case law based on works by Messrs. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:39 am by Eilionoir Flynn
The first of these was the judgement issued by the Second Section of the European Court of Human Rights in May 2010 on the case of Alajos Kiss v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 3:46 am by SHG
The public safety exception of New York v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by Layla Kuhl
The Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in 5 cases, denied 12 applications for leave to appeal, held People v Owens in abeyance pending the Court’s decision in People v Williams, and took action in 5 cases in lieu of granting leave to appeal. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:33 am by gstasiewicz
On November 2, 2010, Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking the following information: Any and all records of communication between the Civil Rights Division and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Legal Defense Fund (including, but not limited to communications with Kristen Clarke, Director of Political Participation) concerning, regarding or relating to U.S. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
The opinion strikes me as in pretty direct tension with cases like ACLU v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:40 am by Sarah Riley Howard
On March 22, 2011, the Court of Appeals approved for publication an opinion originally released on February 1 in People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 7:17 am by Layla Kuhl
The Michigan Supreme Court ordered that trial court proceedings be stayed in People v Pullen while the application for leave to appeal remained pending in the Court of Appeals. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Naturally, she sued the railroad.The issue in Palsgraf v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
The Supreme Court has given judgment in Patmalniece v SSWP [2011] UKSC 11, a case which required consideration of what constitutes direct discrimination on nationality grounds under EU law and, in cases of indirect discrimination, whether a concern to prevent “ social tourism” is a justification which is independent of nationality. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:03 pm by Stephen Gillers
"The reason, the court said in the case of Amnesty International USA v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kerr offered to the Justices in Davis v. [read post]