Search for: "People v. Wells" Results 9661 - 9680 of 26,729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2017, 6:07 am
Not surprisingly, but importantly, the Working Group highlights indigenous rights issues within Canada, noting the commitment of the current federal government to implementation of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) as well as the recommendations of the 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) on the need for Canada to build a “new relationship with indigenous peoples based on equal respect, dignity and human rights” (for… [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 4:28 pm
  However, enough time has passed that a lot of people won't see it, and I like that post the way it is, so I'll throw a few things together in this post and resume my Christmas break.-- This story by Errol Castens in the Daily Journal is a well-written profile of Tim Balducci. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
I am jealous of people who work for those companies. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:42 am
  Until I read the 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 4:22 am by SHG
When people show excessive cynicism in the nefarious motives of the Court, I challenge it as well. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 4:38 am by SHG
This isn’t because I have no morals, or have anything against people who do, but that it’s not an argument except at its fringes. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:54 am by SHG
  This was the rule since Marbury v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Davies doorstepped convicted fraudster Neelam Desai once and sent her two emails over claims she had conned people out of thousands of pounds. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am by Jack Chin
Well, not really, but I feel silly complaining about it. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:38 am by Transplanted Lawyer
  Seems to me that the "beyond the commerce power" ship sailed sixty-eight years ago with the case of Wickard v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  In fact, a large reason for the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:48 pm by Randy Barnett
 And, although I hoped against hope that Judge Silberman was not telegraphing his position when he strongly asserted that the “logic” of Wickard v. [read post]