Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 9661 - 9680 of 14,178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 9:10 am by Colin Lachance
A & W Canada, 2013 HRTO 1259 Quebec (Attorney General) v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” “The problem of American Indian and Alaska Native children’s exposure to violence is complex and widespread and can have devastating consequences for these children,” said Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs Karol V. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 Chief Judge Merrick Garland brings up the case of Johnson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:52 am by Tim O'Connell
Earlier this week, a three judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its long-awaited decision in DR Horton Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am by Neil Cahn
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
”[29]  As few as twenty organisms have been said to be sufficient to infect a person and, as a result, possibly kill them.[30]  And unlike generic E. coli, the O157:H7 serotype multiplies at temperatures up to 44° Fahrenheit, survives freezing and thawing, is heat resistant, grows at temperatures up to 111° Fahrenheit, resists drying, and can survive exposure to acidic environments.[31] And, finally, to make it even more of a dangerous threat, E. coli O157:H7… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:09 am by Brian Hall
I have to admit that I generally love it when a federal court judge begins an opinion with a flourish like this: “December 20, 2011, was defining day for Appellant Angela Powell-Pickett. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Even worse: the fake link/clickbait headlines as if editorially generated. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:54 am by Marisa Hourdajian
For questions regarding the court’s ruling and class action waivers generally, please feel free to contact an attorney in the Gibbons Employment & Labor Department. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
It has been repeatedly held that the adoption of Rule 411 did not serve to affect the pre-existing and still valid rule of law generally prohibiting the mentioning of insurance in any regard during civil trials, including at motor vehicle accident trials, as in Henery v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
It has been repeatedly held that the adoption of Rule 411 did not serve to affect the pre-existing and still valid rule of law generally prohibiting the mentioning of insurance in any regard during civil trials, including at motor vehicle accident trials, as in Henery v. [read post]