Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 9661 - 9680
of 17,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:57 am
This line count does not include source code for the proprietary database storage systems designed by TLO. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm
The Supreme Court disagreed with the lower court's ruling on several counts. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:23 pm
The complaint lists seven claims: · Count I: Violation of Section 1125 (a) of the Lanham Act · Count II: Violation of Section 1125 (d) of the Lanham Act · Count III: Unfair Competition · Count IV: Violation of Indiana Right of Publicity… [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:20 pm
The case is Peugh v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:45 am
From my colleague, Andrew Moratzka: On June 7th, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion in Illinois Commerce Commission, et al., v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
In American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
Myrthil later stated he believed seizure of the bag was necessary for officer safety. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
Peugh involved a defendant who was convicted and sentenced on bank fraud counts. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:53 pm
A case granted for next Term, Burt v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:26 pm
I'm as sympathetic as the next person to the claim that slight administrative hassles don't permit a bureaucracy to infringe fundamental rights. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
Patent No. 8,419,307) · Count V for Patent Infringement (Inducement to Infringe U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:24 pm
The 76 false filing counts concern those written instruments, 76 travel vouchers (formally called NYS Assembly Member Per Diem Expenses Reimbursement Vouchers), which the counts alleged the defendant offered for filing with the intent to defraud the State, knowing that each contained a false statement and false information concerning travel expenses that the defendant purported to incur in Kings and other counties. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 10:55 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:38 pm
An analysis of the Versailles Court of Appeal case AFPS and OLP v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Maryland v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:55 pm
As held in the case of People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:30 am
Hollow field-of-use limitations and insignificant pre or post-solution activity don’t count. [read post]
