Search for: "State v House" Results 9661 - 9680 of 27,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
”  The Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
The House of Lords begins the Committee Stage of the Data Protection Bill on 30 October 2017. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:47 pm by Giles Peaker
That settled accommodation forms such a ‘break’ was held in Din v Wandsworth London Borough Council [1983] 1 AC 657, as approved by the House of Lords in R v London Borough of Brent ex parte Awua [1996] 1 AC 55. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Amr al-Azm, associate professor at Shawnee State University, drew attention to the importance of Syrian cultural heritage and the importance of non-state actors to preserve it. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am by Legal Beagle
Questions are now being asked why SBC claim ignorance of any of the events surrounding NERR which  also controlled New Earth Solutions Group.The full Isle of Man court judgement is here: IOM FSA v THE ECO RESOURCES FUND / 14 July 2017 / CIVIL - CHANCERY PROCEDUREA feature on the report is available here; Fresh calls for "waste fiasco" inquiryFull updates on the Scottish Borders Council fiasco and other news from the Scottish Borders can be found… [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 1:51 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Ak-Chin Indian Community (Same-Sex Marriage)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlPaquin v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 1:51 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Ak-Chin Indian Community (Same-Sex Marriage)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlPaquin v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 5:47 am by bryannewland
The House Natural Resources Committee cited this theory in a memorandum it published in 2015: In Carcieri v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:48 pm by Richard Hunt
It stated only that the plaintiff had a mental disability and needed a support animal. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:03 am by Jesse Tyner Moore
The Supreme Court has consistently held that such state measures are pre-empted by the Federal Arbitration Act, most recently in May’s 7-1 opinion Kindred Nursing Centers, LP v. [read post]