Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 9661 - 9680
of 13,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2023, 12:43 pm
See Hess v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:51 am
" Search Engine Land has more [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:37 am
See Hardman v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:25 pm
Western Delta Lands, 2003 BCCA 180; Rafferty v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 8:01 am
But right or wrong, the fact remains that we all must follow Obergefell, the law of the land. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
That investigation is also far more complex in the United States than a look at the organization of its government might suggest. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
The land of relationship-endia tends to be unkind, and narcissistic. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
State Bar of California and Lathrop v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
” And the proposal stated the same caveat. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 11:18 pm
The current case of Kaiser v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:43 am
Wyoming, a case involving the validity of federal treaty rights allowing Indian tribes to hunt on U.S. lands; and Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:50 pm
It also held in City of San Diego v CSUSD that the state university system cannot limit its mitigation measures to those specifically funded by the Legislature, affirmed in Newhall Land that greenhouse gas (GHG) emission impacts can be measured against statewide GHG-reduction targets set out in AB 32, while at the same time finding the State’s GHG analysis lacking. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:01 pm
The high court’s other currently pending CEQA case is County of Butte v. [read post]
