Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 9661 - 9680
of 13,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2011, 3:05 pm
State v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:38 pm
Barak’s recent paper on the “rabbinic cartels” reminded me that I wanted to provide some updates on Kamakahi v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:53 am
March 4, 2011) (partially granting certification motion in TPP average wholesale price litigation); Sergeants Benevolent Ass’n Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:16 am
See Bauman v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:58 pm
In the case of State v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Rather, as the Appellate Body stated, "{i}t depends on the facts of each case. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Weiner v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:53 am
One of the key cases that guide shoplifting prosecutions in New York City as well as the rest of New York State is People v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:06 am
Bradford v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:15 am
” (Watkins v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 7:47 am
Brenston v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:00 am
Stecker v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:10 pm
Stetson v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:58 pm
In addition, the structure of the agreements between Ingenico and VeriFone, the only two significant POS sellers in the United States post-merger, enhances VeriFone and Ingenico’s ability to coordinate pricing for all POS terminals.The complaint is U.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:55 am
The menu states that, “A 20% service charge will be added to the listed prices. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:13 am
Posted by Holli HartmanIn Whitehead v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am
The special price is good Friday, Saturday and Sunday nights. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:32 am
Goldberg v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:49 am
Environmental economists have a couple of theoretical answers—“[c]ompensating [v]ariation” or “[e]quivalent [v]ariation. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:20 pm
The facts were as stated above. [read post]
