Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 9661 - 9680
of 9,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
The Attorney General of New Hampshire argues that the correct procedural rule is the rule of United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictionsTennessee v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:30 am
Per United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:02 am
Delivery means the placing of a document in the United States mail, first-class postage paid, addressed to the last known address of the recipient.Hand delivery also constitutes delivery. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 1:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:14 pm
If they did, the Chevron framework in administrative law would be hard to justify-at least if Chevron is to be justified, as it is in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
The Court held in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:09 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 3:04 pm
United States involved the question of who is to bear the burden of proof... [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:11 pm
United States, which concerned the question of whether the NIH could be held contributorily or vicariously liable for photocopying by its researchers: Only a few minutes remained in the half hour allotted for his argument, and [attorney for the publisher Alan] Latman had so far been able to sidestep the question he feared most. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 6:58 pm
It found:“The Pet Silk® mark has been registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the last 10 years and has been in use for the last 15 years at least. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 1:56 am
A "taking" may more readily be found when the interference with property can be characterized as a physical invasion by government, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
However, the Commission concluded that, while JEDEC minutes indicated a “reluctance” to adopt patented technologies, those minutes did not “state that the committee will not standardize a patented technology, and the basic JEDEC and EIA documents repeatedly spell out procedures under which patented technologies may be accepted. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:20 pm
§ 2554, that requires the United States military to assist the Boy Scouts organization with its Jamboree, a big to-do held every four years. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 2:49 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Discusses Withdrawal Under Rule 36(b); Determines Lower Court Did Not Abuse Discretion
5 Apr 2007, 2:44 am
United States, 45 F.3d 1345, 1348 (9th Cir.1995); see also Carney v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 8:26 am
The United States' petition on the same set of rules asserted different grounds and could be successful. [read post]
