Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 9661 - 9680
of 21,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
In Matal v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
Not all the news was good on the relist front, though. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
HD is the registered owner of the SCREAMIN’ EAGLE trademark for clothing in the United States and other countries but does not have such a registration in Canada. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, argued next on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of petitioner. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:32 pm
Image: The 2009 United States Supreme Court - Public Domain as a work of the United States Federal Government. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:32 pm
Image: The 2009 United States Supreme Court - Public Domain as a work of the United States Federal Government. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:47 pm
Exhibit A offered in support of that proposition: McKay v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; In United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
Hughes thinks that TRIPs was a big package, not one-sided, and the overall package brought good and bad. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:25 pm
American Traffic Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
One way to think about what was being considered in the Kirtsaeng case is to look at it as a tariff — an attempt to guarantee extra, post-sale income from goods when they were imported into the United States by forcing purchasers to license certain uses of those goods they had already bought. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:50 pm
Of course, experts in this area — including some Obama-supporting liberals — told us that Citizens United wasn’t that big a deal.)Thanks to last year’s juicy Obama v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
United StatesDocket: 10-18Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate DivisionAmicus brief of the… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:41 am
It affirmed as to promissory estoppel as a valid contract exists between the parties. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals United States v Jones Jones was convicted of unlawful grazing his cattle on public lands and unlawful use of public lands. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:59 am
SC06-2391 v. [read post]