Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 9681 - 9700 of 11,016
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
For the following reasons, we AFFIRM. 08a0343p.062008/09/09 BellSouth Tele Inc v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
The respondent’s brief on the merits is due Monday in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 12:51 am
  Action, an association of owners of developed and undeveloped properties, challenged the ordinance as an unlawful uncompensated  taking and asserted that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Lingle v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46)   Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M &;amp; A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:12 am
  The District Court relied on Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 10:12 am
Only three BSE-infected cows have been found in the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 6:16 am
The trial of Mattel, Inc. v MGA Entertainment, Inc. began on May 27, 2008, in United States Court of the Central District of California in Riverside, Calif., and was presided by the Honorable Stephen G. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
Piccarelli, a test of the President’s power to order the military detention of civilians captured inside the United States and suspected of terrorist links, but not charged with any crimes. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
&;amp; Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an &;lsquo;OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
UtilCorp United, Inc., 497 U.S. 199 (1990); because plaintiffs were “indirect purchasers,” defendants argued that they lacked standing to prosecute the antitrust class action. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Health, 275 F.3d 156, 167 (2d Cir.2001)); Watchtower Bible &;amp; Tract Soc'y of New York, Inc. v. [read post]