Search for: "Deal v. Deal" Results 9681 - 9700 of 38,578
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by Stone Law, P.C.
Previously, the Supreme Court opinion which was most influential in ‘gray market’ dealings was Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:41 pm by Florian Mueller
The logic of the proposed FTC-Google deal is that injunctive relief must be denied against "willing licensees". [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
 (Here, there were a bunch of cases dealing with the exact same fact pattern that go the other way, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:36 am by Elizabeth Kruska
There really isn't an appropriate photo for this case.State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm by Florian Mueller
The key change is that they allege a per se violation of the Sherman Act through Google's "Project Hug" (of which the deal with Activision Blizzard King is the most interesting part now, but there were about two dozen deals like that). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:48 am by Hayleigh Bosher
He said: "Finally, the performers have their own voice, can negotiate their own deals, and get fair remuneration. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:42 pm by Lisa Ouellette
The Court did carve out a possible workaround last Term in the wonderfully named Lewis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 2:13 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
 In chapter 7, Debunking the Fair Use vs Fair Dealing Myth: Have We Had Fair Use All Along? [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:52 am by Nick Dyson, Olswang LLP
The contributory rule and the rule in Cherry v Boultbee The Court of Appeal agreed with the High Court that the Contributory Rule should not be extended to apply in administration. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 4:23 pm
Sykes look pretty bad, and likely justly so, since it casts a great deal of doubt about his credibility (which is pretty important when choosing a doctor to work on your face, no?) [read post]