Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 9681 - 9700
of 17,879
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:21 pm
Quoting Silverman v CBS, Justice Posner stated that "[t]he copyrights on the derivative works, corresponding to the copyrights on the ten last Sherlock Holmes stories, were not extended by virtue of the incremental additions of originality in the derivative works". [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Sentencing Guidelines, which control sentencing in the federal criminal justice system. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:47 am
See State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 1:56 am
Re-tail service? [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:30 am
White v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 1:03 am
PatLit writes up a recent England and Wales ruling by Mr Justice Birss, in Nampak v Alpla, on when the courts can safely dispense with expert evidence even in a patent trial. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:24 pm
Sometimes proposing an Article V Amendment is one intervention in a larger conversation—a conversation that also includes, for instance, the Senate confirmation hearings for new Justices. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
Even though we’re tightening components of the OVDP, we still believe it’s a better deal than the alternative, because if we find you, you will face higher penalties and, as the record shows, could face criminal prosecution and jail time. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:39 am
The Supreme Court of Canada’s unusual request to re-hear a case in order to allow newly appointed Justice Clément Gascon to participate has led many observers to assume an even split among judges, requiring a tiebreaker — but there are other possibilities to consider.The request was sent yesterday to counsel in Conception v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
Instead, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
Instead, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
” United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am
Justice Burke argued that the Court had said in Rios v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
On Monday 30 June 2014, Mr Justice Saunders heard mitigation on behalf the four defendants who had pleaded guilty. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm
The Seventh Circuit said “no” in Notre Dame v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 11:39 am
Justice Kilbride asked whether the trial court had decided the non-constitutional issues, and counsel answered that the court’s view was if you file a lawsuit, you’re a debt collector. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am
In the case of “Aunt Sally v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:29 am
Bailey v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
Franks, the Court unanimously re-affirmed its holding from Garcetti v. [read post]
