Search for: "John Robert"
Results 9681 - 9700
of 20,574
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2015, 11:14 am
According to Chief Justice John Roberts: “Because the officer’s mistake about the brake-light law was reasonable… the stop in this case was lawful under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:33 am
Instead, contrary to the ideal that John Roberts described in [Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:04 am
Writing for a unanimous Court, Chief Justice John Roberts explained that in a bankruptcy proceeding it is the confirmation of a plan and dismissal of a whole case that have the kind of serious consequences that approximate finality in the general civil context. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am
Florida Bar, in which the Court upheld a Florida rule that prohibits candidates for judgeships from personally soliciting campaign contributions, continues with posts from Ilya Shapiro, Robert Durham, Robert Corn-Revere, and Joshua Wheeler. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:59 pm
Brian Roberts runs the world’s largest media company, Chris Matthews works for him and supports Israel. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts’s opinion for the Court (and, in particular, his discussion of the level of scrutiny that garnered three other votes), sought to “dispel the notion that strict scrutiny is ‘strict in theory, but fatal in fact. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:41 pm
The majority opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts rests on one simple conclusion: judicial campaign speech is different than campaign speech for other types of public office. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am
In his opinion, Chief Justice Roberts writes that “Judges are not politicians, [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:04 am
Supreme Court in an argued case: Chief Justice John G. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
Chief Justice John Roberts, for the majority (joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor in full, and by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg except as to the part saying that strict scrutiny applies) “The Florida Bar faces a demanding task in defending Canon 7C(1) against Yulee’s First Amendment challenge. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:00 am
to FDR to Robert Jackson to the Hirabayashi, Korematsu, and Endo, to Norma McCorvey to Thurgood Marshall . . . [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:14 am
Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision focused on the unique aspects of judging, reasoning, “Judges are not politicians, even when they come to the bench by way of the ballot. [read post]
3 May 2015, 12:30 am
The Wall Street Journal has a review by John Fabian Witt of Richard Reeve's Infamy: The Shocking Story of the Japanese-American Internment in World War II (Henry Holt & Co.).In the Texas Law Review, Aziz Rana reviews Robert L. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:32 am
Roberts, Jr., about discrimination based on gender rather than sexual orientation might mean. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:00 am
Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s four liberal justices in the decision to uphold a Florida prohibition on such personal solicitations, saying states have a compelling interest in “preserving the public confidence in the integrity of its judiciary. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:37 am
At the oral argument in the Supreme Court's same-sex marriage case this week, Chief Justice John Roberts asked: “if Sue loves Joe and Tom loves Joe, Sue can marry him and Tom can’t. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:00 pm
Roberts submitted proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to Congress via an order, accompanied by letters to Speaker of the House John Boehner and President of the Senate (and Vice President of the US) Joe Biden. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:16 pm
” And a few minutes later, Chief Justice John Roberts joined the fray, lamenting to Konrad that although her “client is guilty of a capital offense” and “is eligible for the death penalty,” “you put us in a position with your argument that he can’t be executed, even though he satisfies all those requirements. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:59 pm
Thanks to its appearance in the Supreme Court oral argument as a result of a question by Chief Justice John Roberts, the sex discrimination argument against laws banning same-sex marriage has attracted the attention of critics on both the left and right. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
However, as Chief Justice John Roberts notes in his opinion, judges have no constituents. [read post]
