Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 9681 - 9700
of 51,436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2024, 8:16 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:32 pm
Q: The case was generally viewed as being the most important personal-injury case in the California Supreme Court since Li v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 3:55 pm
Back in October, the Supreme Court decided not to hear the case of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
The vast majority of drug cases I’ve handled have not involved a weapon, and the actual experience of other attorneys I’ve talked to corresponds to that in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
The vast majority of drug cases I’ve handled have not involved a weapon, and the actual experience of other attorneys I’ve talked to corresponds to that in State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:52 am
By Eric Goldman Habush v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 11:51 am
Its application in 440.185(1)(d) cases was described in Tomberlin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
It also reversed in People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:00 pm
” In Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am
The federal district court judge who has the case began her analysis of the first argument by noting that the 4th Amendment protects people from "unreasonable searches and seizures" of their persons and effects. . . . [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
People often react negatively to the experience of being arrested. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 2:03 pm
In State of Maine v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:08 am
If Congress or the IRS wants to allow people to so easily avoid capital gains taxes, they're free to do so. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm
It's an AEDPA case, so the federal court grants a degree of deference to the state court's conclusions in this regard. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
Case Citation: Liverman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
The judge made the following comments: “The directors are intelligent, experienced and conscientious people. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:06 am
The case of Frances G., shows us that police will treat juveniles like adults in many aspects. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
According to the Court the case should be sent back to determine the restitution owed because “[b]efore a defendant may be directed to pay restitution, a hearing must be held if either: (1) the defendant objects to the amount of restitution and the record is insufficient to establish the proper amount; or (2) the defendant requests a hearing” (People v Morrishill, 127 AD3d 993, 994; see Penal Law § 60.27[2]; People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d… [read post]
