Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 9681 - 9700
of 16,997
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2014, 12:39 pm
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals this week issued an odd and confusing opinion in a case styled Johnson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
Thomas, the court in the case of People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
Accession: if granting a party an adjacent market, is it because we expect the party to have superior ability to enter/manage? [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
So we have exhaustion in theory but in practice a retailer can prevent it.Dorpan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
Cohen v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
In a ruling that sent shockwaves through the internet community, the Ninth Circuit, with one judge dissenting, found that an injunction should have been granted against YouTube, requiring removal of the “Innocence of Muslims” film. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Thanks to Conor McEvily, Dmitry “Slavin’ on Relist Watch,” and Jeremy Marwell for compiling and drafting this update: It takes three people to achieve the same level of semi-humorous obfuscation as Eric White. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:38 pm
I articulated a lot of reasons why that decision might in fact be wrong.Today the Court of Appeal, which granted review of this decision, shared my view. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
We know from Guenther v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:05 am
Yesterday in De Leon v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
The chief prosecutor in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:43 am
Great White Shark Enterprises, Inc.. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:56 pm
Madigan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:34 pm
Grant & Co. v Srogi and Hightower v Reid. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm
In the 1996 case of Romer v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
At the very least it showed that the court had been perfectly aware of some people's abolitionist hopes and dreams, but declined their invitations to legislate from the bench on an issue it simply didn't have to reach.Four years later history appears to be repeating itself as a result of the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari (i.e., decision to hear the case) in CLS Bank v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:58 am
V. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
In any event, she'd bet a leaf or two of her favourite catnip that most people on the planet don't even know that there are two Mercks. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
The case of Ironside v. [read post]
