Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 9681 - 9700
of 55,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 pm
HP alleges that Acer, its Taiwanese competitor, knowingly violated HP patents, which are directed to optical drives, clock frequency switching and power consumption. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 3:31 am
” At Slate (via How Appealing), Lorelai Laird writes that United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
The False Claims Act (FCA) has long served as a powerful weapon against fraud and waste in government programs, from rancid Civil War rations to Medicare scams. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:17 pm
The origin of the Pitchess motion starts with a prior California Supreme Court case, titled Pitchess v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:49 pm
In my view, there is a less than 1% chance that courts will invalidate the individual mandate as exceeding Congress’s Article I power. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court twice in 1888, first with The Telephone Cases (126 U.S. 1), and then with United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
In Sue Carter v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
National Association of Home Builders v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:45 am
In criminal law it's a court's power to adjudicate the charges brought against someone. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company (Belgium v Spain) (1970)Giorgio Gaja14. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts asked today whether Arizona v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:59 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Thompson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:33 am
Power, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:25 pm
The Court recalled its classic case law according to which Article 308 EC may be used as the legal basis for a measure only where no other provision of the EC Treaty gives the EU institutions the necessary power to adopt it (Case C-84/94 United Kingdom v Council [1996] ECR I-5755, paragraph 48 (working time directive case); Case C-22/96 Parliament v Council [1998] ECR I-3231, paragraph 22; and Case C-436/03 Parliament v Council [2006] ECR I-3733, paragraph 36. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:50 am
Still, what the court says is quite powerful: Shouting “DISCRIMINATION! [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:16 pm
In a 1981 case, Edwards v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:16 pm
In a 1981 case, Edwards v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
In FTC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:37 pm
” Patience, grasshopper: Mass. v. [read post]
