Search for: "State of Connecticut" Results 9681 - 9700 of 17,609
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2012, 10:51 am by Dawinder "Dave" S. Sidhu
Michelle Alexander (Ohio State) discussed her compelling new book, "The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness" (New Press), on last night's edition of the Colbert Report. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:28 am by Richard Painter
   Lawyers and judges made it clear in the 1960’s that the State of Connecticut could not take sides and prohibit the sale of birth control. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:08 am
Diamond Pet Foods has been linked to at least 14 cases of human Salmonella Infantis infections in nine states, according to a May 3, 2012 report from CDC. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:58 am by Ryan McKeen
Commissioner of Public Health Connecticut is a State that does not tolerate or codify hatred. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
These terms come from the General Statutes of Connecticut:   Felony (General Statutes § 53a-25): An offense for which a person may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment in excess of one year is a felony. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:03 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
  Apparently, the last time North Carolina amended its State Constitution to define marriage, it banned interracial marriage! [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:36 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Even as Connecticut became the 17th state to legalize marijuana for medicinal purposes last week, the DEA continues to bring the heat on some of the more visible pot crusaders across the country. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:23 am by Walter Olson
Haywood Burns Institute, its board adorned by Northwestern lawprof Bernardine Dohrn; more, Chicago Sun-Times] Speaking of gruesome austerity in public expenditure, there’s clearly no room left to cut the state of Connecticut’s budget either [Chris Powell on $300,000 for the New Haven People's Center] Tweet Tags: Bernardine Dohrn, Connecticut But there’s no more room to cut the budget is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our… [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:21 pm by Brennan W. Bolt
According to Eric Excell-Bailey, a spokesman for AFT Connecticut, a vote to form the union could occur as the early as the end of this month. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:48 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
  The state already had a statute banning same-sex marriage. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:12 pm by Royal LLP
” With such a broad definition, the proposed law will apply to virtually every business within the state of Connecticut. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:56 pm by PritzkerLaw
From there, IMG members selected and mapped four of the clusters of illnesses in Connecticut, Rhode Island, Texas, and Wisconsin. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:56 pm by PritzkerLaw
From there, IMG members selected and mapped four of the clusters of illnesses in Connecticut, Rhode Island, Texas, and Wisconsin. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:37 am by Steve Hall
In his April 30 column, “Connecticut’s courage,” E.J. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:42 am
" In its ruling, the Connecticut high court said the issues raised by the company in its appeal were that state law does not provide for hostile work environment claims; even if such claims could be brought under state law, the plaintiff presented insufficient evidence to support the jury's finding of a hostile work environment; and the award was unsupported by the evidence and was excessive. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:24 am by Daniel Schwartz
Besides just permitting individuals to use marijuana, it has several important provisions that will impact employers in Connecticut. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:16 am by Brennan W. Bolt
The governor says the legislation will make Connecticut more competitive in applying for critical federal money. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:15 pm by Los Angeles Lawyer
On the other hand, while California was reportedly seen to have a decrease in unemployment benefit claims, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Puerto Rico and Rhode Island were seen to have a significant increase in jobless claim. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:14 pm by djackson
It's been nearly fifty years since the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Connecticut v Griswold striking down state bans on birth control. [read post]