Search for: "State v House"
Results 9681 - 9700
of 27,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 1:31 am
" In National Pride at Work, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:08 am
Plaintiff, a Taino Indian, claims that he was wrongly placed on an out of state transfer list that resulted in his transfer to a Virginia state prison where he was made to shave and get a hair cut even though he had religious exemption in Pennsylvania.In Golosow v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Fla.) in HM Florida-ORL, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:23 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:19 pm
Leave the gun at homeState v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:26 am
The first case, Jardines v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:40 am
In the House, residents of the territories have only a single non-voting delegate. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 3:00 am
State Abortion Laws Tracker After Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 3:15 pm
" What: Motion Hearing in Rubin v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:05 am
The Court of Appeals sides with the state in this case, but not before taking a deep dive into whether an inmate was properly disciplined for possessing photographs of family and friends depicting perceived signs of gang affiliation.The case is Williams v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:58 pm
In the recent case of Yakich v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:17 am
The narrow 5-4 decision in US v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 6:45 am
In this case, the defendant was convicted of murder and has already spent quite some time in the big house, but the Second Circuit finds the state trial court denied him a fair trial.The case is Scrimo v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 8:07 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
The judgment comes as a surprise, as the previously established UK case law had over time firmly done away with the idea of ‘pith and marrow’ infringement, culminating in the seminal House of Lords judgment in Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel [2004] UKHL 46. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
The judgment comes as a surprise, as the previously established UK case law had over time firmly done away with the idea of ‘pith and marrow’ infringement, culminating in the seminal House of Lords judgment in Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel [2004] UKHL 46. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
National Housing Partnership (read decision here). [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
" Carl Spackler.Dunes West, recognizing that only legal means could allow it to put more houses on the Golf Course Property, submitted two different zoning requests seeking designations permitting houses to be built near the golf course. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
Carl Spackler.Dunes West, recognizing that only legal means could allow it to put more houses on the Golf Course Property, submitted two different zoning requests seeking designations permitting houses to be built near the golf course. [read post]
