Search for: "State v. Liberty" Results 9681 - 9700 of 9,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
Louis, MO 63103 Phone: (314) 241-3464 Fax: (314) 371-0000 E-mail: mogoodwill@mo-goodwill.org Web: http://www.mersgoodwill.org Healthcare Family Voices Missouri Sarah Zerr Phone: (816) 455-2977 E-mail: shzkcmo@aol.com The state's Title V agency will soon have a Family Advisory Council, led by a parent facilitator, who provide information and support to parent groups in Missouri, and will also ensure the family perspective and input on major Title V decisions… [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Alan E. Brownstein
As a court of appeals judge, Judge Kavanaugh was required to construe and apply Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2008 majority opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 May 2025, 6:05 am by Hilary J. Allen
Individual software program developers affiliated with Tornado Cash and backed by the Coinbase crypto exchange challenged OFAC’s determination, arguing in Van Loon v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
The complete denial of access to the Internet implicates a liberty interest, which in turn triggers due process concerns. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Good It is also worth emphasizing, however, that the Obama Administration, civil liberties and human rights organizations, and some members of Congress worked tirelessly and quite effectively to improve the final bill dramatically from the versions the Senate and (especially) the House had earlier passed. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
The Good It is also worth emphasizing, however, that the Obama Administration, civil liberties and human rights organizations, and some members of Congress worked tirelessly and quite effectively to improve the final bill dramatically from the versions the Senate and (especially) the House had earlier passed. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Taylor Gulatsi
The State Law Libraries Outreach Initiative to strengthen the ties between the Law Library of Congress and state law libraries continues. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
The civil rights revolution begins with the Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
This test, established 37 years ago in the dissent of Justice de Grandpré in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:01 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Baron’s essay challenges Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
“Federal power bad, state power good” is a recurrent theme among those who come to Constitution Day via the Tea Party (see Jayde Wyatt at Mitt Romney Central: “Our U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (Wolfe v Shawcor Ltd, 2016 ABQB 261) “It seems to me at this point this is somewhat parallel to the Pythonesque description of a particular parrot” (Karl Hermanns v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
Below you will find the Pennsylvania UCP affiliates: UCP of Pennsylvania 1902 Market Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 761-6129; (866) 761-6129 (Toll Free) Fax: (717) 761-2534 E-mail: info@ucpofpa.org Web: http://www.ucpofpa.org UCP Central PA 44 South 38th Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 975-0611 Fax: (717) 975-0839 E-mail: kidscenter@ucpcentralpa.org Web: http://www.ucpcentralpa.org Administrative Office/Alternatives West 925 Linda Lane Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717)… [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Putting aside rights that arise from contractual or other state-law guarantees of academic freedom, if a public employee is speaking (even on matters of public concern) while on the job, qua employee, then under the 2006 Supreme Court Garcetti v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]