Search for: "VI"
Results 9681 - 9700
of 13,329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
However, it is elected by and accountable to the General Assembly (Article VI Section 7). [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
Within that discussion, we at the Tax Foundation argue that the effective corporate income tax rate is too high in the United States and makes our businesses less competitive vis-a-vis foreign companies. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
In general, the law in Virginia and elsewhere holds that people in a position of trust vis-à-vis a closely held corporation must perform their duties without self-dealing or conflict of interest. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
In doing so, they invoked the court’s original jurisdiction under article VI, section 10, of the state constitution, which authorizes the court to exercise “original jurisdiction in proceedings for extraordinary relief in the nature of mandamus, certiorari, and prohibition.” The filing, however, could violate one of the bills being challenged, which includes a provision stating that, “[n]otwithstanding any other law, any action contesting… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice H.L. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 9:19 am
Part VI proposes a restricted construction on these decisions so as to limit the potential damage that these decisions can cause. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
BR 11-0939 Includes “probation officers” of the Superior Court of the VI as peace officers with all rights associated there in. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:09 pm
In addition, there can be one or more shareholder agreements, which set forth the rights that shareholders have vis-a-vis each other (e.g. transfer restrictions, options, or rights of first refusal). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:09 pm
In addition, there can be one or more shareholder agreements, which set forth the rights that shareholders have vis-a-vis each other (e.g. transfer restrictions, options, or rights of first refusal). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:45 pm
The Utah Code that controls this DLD hearing review is section 63G-4-402; “(2) (a) The petition for judicial review of informal adjudicative proceedings shall be a complaint governed by the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and shall include: (i) the name and mailing address of the party seeking judicial review; (ii) the name and mailing address of the respondent agency; (iii) the title and date of the final agency action to be reviewed, together with a copy, summary, or brief description of the… [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm
ALTA Berkely VI C.V. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
As part of our research, we delved into the efficiency of online/offshore sports books vis-à-vis terrestrial sports books in Las Vegas and London. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:38 pm
Justice RaveendranSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in a recent decision, in M/s SMS Tea Estates Pvt. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:46 pm
Like McCarthy, is Bachmann exploiting an electorate that is either uninformed or ill-informed about the debt ceiling in order to increase her standing as she vies for the Republican nomination? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:46 am
One question frequently asked by parents is, "How old should a child be before he can be left home alone? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:14 am
Juli 2011 (VI ZR 217/10) als unbegründet zurück (noch nicht veröffentlicht; siehe aber Pressemitteilung 131/2011 vom gleichen Tag). [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:05 pm
§ 1030(a)(5)(B), (c)(4)(A)(i)(I),(VI)(Recklessly Damaging a Protected Computer) 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:17 pm
Durante el VI Foro Regional: “Hacia un Nuevo Proyecto de Desarrollo” la Secretaria de Hacienda hizo la siguiente presentación titulada Reflexiones sobre el Sistema Tributario en Mexico en la cual se destacan, entre otros, los siguientes puntos: El impuesto predial en Mexico se encuentra subexplotado con indices de recaudación muy desfavorables respecto de paises con un nivel de desarrollo similar al nuestro. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:08 am
And at least one part of UNCLOS is, in my humble opinion, unconstitutional because it essentially gives supreme and self-executing effect to judgments of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’s Seabed Disputes Chamber (See Annex VI, Art. 39). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:21 pm
The following two statements need to be juxtaposed, with minimal comment. [read post]
